Comments on: There Is A Scent Of Revolution In The Air

By: Jeff

Jeff — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:14:02 +0000

I watch all the diff news channels and saw interviews (The whole interview) with various people who Olberman hates, then saw on MSNBC where Olberman took parts an pieces from these interviews and made the people look like idiots. Now if u only watch his show and nothing else then you would believe what you saw. I have seen him do this three diff times. The guy should not have a show because he is a TOTAL LIAR!!!!. No wonder MSNBC is the lowest rated Cable news, they should change the name to MSLSD!!!

By: Pat

Pat — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:15:10 +0000

There’s a world of difference between ranting against the military and what people consider an unjust war.

In order to field a military, must America have a war?

Somewhere in those two questions is a position that respects civil liberties and civil responsibilities – and the use that politicians make of their favoritism of the military, or lack of it, in order to fund the military industrial complex.

As a form of waffling, nothing has been made more clear in history than America’s love/hate relationship with its military.

By: Allan Erickson

Allan Erickson — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:09:56 +0000

http://allanerickson.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/toy-story%e2%80%99s-sid-%e2%80%9cbath-tub-boy-leftwing-bomb-thrower%e2%80%9d/

Have a read!

By: Whatever

Whatever — Thu, 22 May 2008 01:30:19 +0000

Keith has the TRUTH???? What the hell are you smoking MARK?? Keith is spinning HIS version of the truth, nothing more.

I F*CKING HATE OLBERMAN!

By: Mark Reither

Mark Reither — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:24:51 +0000

If what Keith says is not true, why does not someone address the facts and not the assertion that Keith is crazy? Keith has the courage to address the truth, even if all of us do sometimes bias the truth with our beliefs. Keith is a rare and unusual journalist, a man out of his time; Keith is not the sort of milk-toast journalist that we listen to the rest of the time. Keith sees the truth that this war is a horrible crime and the guts to call the leaders who have brought this on us criminals. Keep it up, Keith; expose the crooks as they are.

By: charles

charles — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:43:24 +0000

I agree with above comment. Well written.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:43:04 +0000

If I may, I will be the first to admit, that have never participated in this type of activity, much less responded to any such writings, on these comment blogs, but some of the writings on this blog, for the amount of intelligence the folks that are writing profess to have, with their highly opinionated ideas, need to to stick to the spoken word, as their writing has much to be desired, when folks like Brandon write words like sicking, in place of sickening, it leaves room for some contemplation, on whether what he is writing about is even worth reading. There are always at least 2 sides to every story, and the stories that always seem to make these type of blogs, are always written by the people, who know the least just seem to have a little more time on their hands, then most. To constructively criticize someone you need to sound more convincing, as far as being objective, being open minded, and allowing for some creditability to the person, that you are criticizing, so as to make the criticism sound more genuine. These aimless, useless, profound less shout-outs, seem like the rantings of a frustrated young individual, who for the most part, are full of criticism, and lacking in the social graces of actions to speak for them. It is this type of ranting that gives way to all of these media outlets, to be so successful. They tell you what to talk about, and you do, if there is any blame to give, whether it be Republican or Democrat, you should look to your decisions, on the steps you take to make a difference, don’t be another news corespondent, trying to get a rise out of folks on the subjects they feel are important, due to their supposedly unbiased surveys, they claim to have taken. We have enough of these folks, as we have created a multichannel monster full of button pushing individuals, who take no blame for anything, in the name of speaking the truth and ride on the very fabric, of fairness, justice, and freedom, that this country provides and use it to the extreme degree of bordering slander, and the provocation of the very news they report. Do your own research, make your own decisions based on what you see, as the best thing, then run for office, propose law, or better yet just vote your conscience, and sleep better knowing you did your part. The slamming of great leaders, like Rudy Giuliani, or the like, is not only disrespectful, but unproductive, and it only adds to the adage, that states, the masses will lead, as we have been lead, so if no one changes, then it will not matter, who you put in office, because nothing will change, as the congress majority changed, but nothing happened, because they themselves did not change, to accept leadership. With leadership come great responsibility, and that responsibility sometimes means, that you must work with the powers that be, to allow the wheels of good solid progress to turn. If you noticed I did not say the right progress, I just said good, because at this stage, it is the least we can expect, and in some cases the most, we will be able to achieve. Good luck on your writings Brandon.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:37:38 +0000

I like what I heard, and I’m sure the people who disagree with these facts are just saying so to push our buttons,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsZ_Ep2HZiI

Nobody can be fooled by these corporate puppets, unless they have some personal investment in their campaign.

By: Rufus

Rufus — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:54:16 +0000

WTF!! Liberals are a bunch of whimps and pussies? Is that because they think with their brains and not their dicks and muscles? Primate.

By: Nathaniel

Nathaniel — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:48:32 +0000

ter·ror·ism /ˈtɛrəˌrɪzəm/ –noun
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.